Apple Watch – iPhone owners who want seamless integration
Samsung Galaxy Watch – Android users who want power and endurance
People's opinions
Review by PCMag Middle East 📰
The battle between the Apple Watch Series 10 and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 feels closer than ever — both brands refining their formulas instead of reinventing them. PCMag Middle East describes this matchup as one between “two health-focused, design-driven titans,” where your choice ultimately depends on whether you’re in the Apple or Android camp.
The Apple Watch Series 10 shines through its elegant build, vibrant OLED display, and deeper integration with iOS. With the new S10 chip and watchOS 11, it offers smoother navigation, enhanced fitness insights like Training Load, and expanded water-sport tracking. It also delivers the signature polish Apple is known for — from its premium materials to its vast app ecosystem.
The Galaxy Watch 7, on the other hand, impresses with advanced health metrics like AGEs index, body composition analysis, and snoring detection — features that push it ahead in biometric depth. It’s also notably more affordable, offers solid performance via the Exynos W1000 processor, and boasts compatibility with most Android phones (especially Galaxy devices).
Battery life remains a question mark for Apple’s latest model, as early tests suggest results similar to the Series 9. Samsung’s watch, meanwhile, comfortably lasts over 22 hours even with the always-on display enabled. Design-wise, both are sleek and slim, but PCMag favored Apple’s refined aluminum finish.
In conclusion, PCMag calls it a near-perfect tie — the Apple Watch Series 10 wins for style and software, while the Galaxy Watch 7 earns praise for its value and deeper health data. “Pick your ecosystem,” they note, “and you’ll have one of the best smartwatches of 2025 on your wrist.”
According to NerdyTechBlog, the ongoing rivalry between the Samsung Galaxy Watch and the Apple Watch comes down to one key factor — which ecosystem you live in. Both are exceptional smartwatches, but each shines brightest when paired with its own brand’s smartphones.
The Galaxy Watch embraces a classic circular design with a rotating bezel that delivers a traditional yet sporty look, made from durable stainless steel and aluminum. The Apple Watch, by contrast, keeps its rectangular, ultra-modern face, available in aluminum, stainless steel, or even ceramic. NerdyTechBlog highlights that while design is a matter of taste, Apple feels more futuristic, whereas Samsung leans toward timeless style.
On the software side, Apple’s watchOS is praised for its seamless performance with iPhones and its deep integration with Apple Health. Meanwhile, Samsung’s Wear OS runs best with Android devices—especially Galaxy phones—and provides a more flexible experience overall. When it comes to health and fitness, Apple pulls slightly ahead thanks to advanced metrics like ECG and blood oxygen monitoring, though Samsung wins points for more comprehensive activity and stress tracking.
In daily use, Apple’s interface is considered slightly more intuitive, while Samsung’s combination of touchscreen and rotating bezel offers a tactile experience many users love once they adapt. Battery life is a clear differentiator — the Galaxy Watch lasts 2–3 days, while the Apple Watch usually needs daily charging, even if its fast-charging feature helps.
NerdyTechBlog concludes that the Apple Watch is perfect for iPhone users who value seamless performance, premium materials, and health insights, while the Galaxy Watch is the smarter pick for Android fans who want better battery life and strong fitness tools without breaking the bank.
According to Versus.com, the head-to-head battle between the Apple Watch (42mm) and the Samsung Galaxy Watch (46mm) clearly crowns a winner — and it’s the Samsung Galaxy Watch, which scored 71 points compared to Apple’s 43. Versus calls it a “feature-packed, better-value smartwatch” that outperforms Apple in versatility, endurance, and everyday practicality.
In terms of design and display, the Apple Watch impresses with its larger 1.5-inch sapphire glass screen, thinner 10.5 mm profile, and double the storage capacity (8GB vs 4GB). However, the Galaxy Watch counters with a sharper 391 ppi pixel density, always-on display, and waterproofing—making it far more durable and outdoor-friendly.
When it comes to fitness and health tracking, Samsung takes the lead again. It includes a rich suite of sensors—GPS, ECG, barometer, and blood oxygen monitoring—alongside automatic workout detection and multi-sport modes. Apple offers pace and cadence tracking, but overall, Samsung’s broader data collection and versatility make it more appealing for active users.
Battery life is another major win for Samsung. The Galaxy Watch lasts up to 3 days on a single charge thanks to its 472 mAh battery, compared to Apple’s 18-hour lifespan. Both support wireless charging, but Samsung’s endurance advantage is undeniable.
In connectivity, the Galaxy Watch proves more inclusive—compatible with both Android and iOS, featuring eSIM, NFC, Bluetooth 4.2, and Wi-Fi 4. The Apple Watch remains limited to iOS devices, though its ecosystem integration is smoother for iPhone owners.
Versus also praises Samsung’s added touches like coaching reminders and inactivity alerts, which go beyond Apple’s standard features such as activity reports and goal tracking.
Ultimately, Versus.com concludes that while the Apple Watch remains the sleek, app-rich choice for iPhone users, the Samsung Galaxy Watch delivers greater value, longer battery life, and wider compatibility—making it the better all-round smartwatch for most people.
According to How-To Geek, the latest showdown between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and the Apple Watch Series 10 highlights two premium smartwatches that push wearable technology forward in different ways. Samsung’s model shines with its next-gen health sensors and superior battery life, while Apple’s newest Series 10 takes refinement and ecosystem integration to a new level.
Design-wise, the Galaxy Watch 8 keeps Samsung’s trademark circular style with a sleek “squircle” aluminum casing, touch-sensitive rotating bezel, and military-grade durability (IP68 + MIL-STD-810H). Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 continues Apple’s elegant rectangular form factor with aluminum or titanium casings, IP6X dust resistance, and water resistance suitable for shallow diving. It’s a tale of two philosophies—Samsung’s sporty utility versus Apple’s polished minimalism.
When it comes to displays, the Apple Watch Series 10 offers larger screens (up to 2.04 inches), but Samsung fights back with brighter Super AMOLED panels reaching 3,000 nits, making it easier to read outdoors. Both look gorgeous, but Apple leans toward immersion while Samsung emphasizes usability with its bezel navigation.
Under the hood, Apple’s S10 chip with a built-in Neural Engine delivers impressive smoothness and on-device intelligence, while Samsung’s Exynos W1000 paired with Gemini AI offers smart coaching and real-time health insights. In terms of software, watchOS 11 integrates tightly with the Apple ecosystem, whereas Wear OS 6 gives Android users access to a powerful and open experience.
Health and fitness tracking is where How-To Geek gives Samsung a notable edge. The Galaxy Watch 8 introduces exclusive metrics like vascular load, antioxidant level estimation, and AGEs index, alongside sleep apnea detection and body temperature tracking. Apple’s Series 10, however, wins for precision and usability—featuring ECG, heart alerts, a new Vitals app, and even a depth gauge for snorkeling. Both watches are packed with serious wellness tools, but Samsung’s innovation feels a step ahead this year.
Battery life is another major separator: Samsung lasts up to 40 hours, while Apple tops out around 18–36 hours depending on mode. Pricing also favors Samsung, starting at $349, compared to Apple’s $399–$749 depending on materials and LTE options.
In the end, How-To Geek concludes that the Galaxy Watch 8 is the smarter pick for Android users who want deep health analytics and longer endurance, while the Apple Watch Series 10 remains the top-tier option for iPhone users who value seamless performance and premium craftsmanship.
According to GSMArena’s detailed specs comparison, the Apple Watch Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Watch target two very different kinds of smartwatch users — Apple’s rugged premium adventurer versus Samsung’s elegant everyday performer.
The Apple Watch Ultra takes durability and performance to new extremes with its titanium frame, sapphire crystal protection, and MIL-STD-810H certification. It’s also rated for 100 meters of water resistance and even supports diving, making it the clear favorite for explorers and athletes who push their gear to the limit. By contrast, the Galaxy Watch features a stainless steel body, Gorilla Glass DX+, and IP68 resistance, keeping it tough enough for daily use but not quite as adventure-ready as Apple’s Ultra.
When it comes to display, Apple’s 1.92-inch Retina LTPO OLED easily outshines Samsung’s smaller 1.3-inch Super AMOLED, offering higher resolution (502×410) and superior clarity under sunlight. The sapphire protection on Apple’s screen also adds a more premium feel compared to the Galaxy Watch’s Gorilla Glass DX+.
Under the hood, Apple’s S8 chipset paired with watchOS 9 (upgradable) provides a smooth and efficient experience with 32GB of internal storage, perfect for offline music, apps, and maps. Samsung’s Exynos 9110 running Tizen OS 5.5 still performs well but feels dated by comparison, with only 4GB of storage and less long-term software support.
Both smartwatches include Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, and eSIM, but Apple adds Ultra Wideband (UWB) for pinpoint location tracking — a subtle yet significant advantage for those deep in the outdoors.
Battery life tells a similar story: Apple’s 542 mAh cell delivers impressive endurance, charging from 0 to 80% in about an hour, while Samsung’s 472 mAh battery performs decently but offers shorter uptime.
In terms of health and sensors, Apple Watch Ultra dominates with a full suite: ECG, SpO2, VO2max, body and water temperature sensors, a depth gauge, and even dual speakers reaching 86 dB. The Galaxy Watch, meanwhile, keeps the essentials — heart rate, barometer, accelerometer, and Samsung Pay — and remains a simpler, more affordable choice.
Price ultimately defines the gap between them: the Apple Watch Ultra sits around €550, while the Samsung Galaxy Watch costs about €220 — less than half.
In the end, GSMArena concludes that the Apple Watch Ultra is the premium choice for extreme users demanding maximum durability and advanced sensors, whereas the Samsung Galaxy Watch remains a smart, stylish option for everyday users seeking functionality at a fraction of the cost.
The 2025 battle between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and the Apple Watch Series 10 is all about refinement, power, and ecosystem polish. Bandletic’s detailed comparison highlights how both brands are pushing the limits of what a smartwatch can be — blending advanced health tracking, AI-driven intelligence, and premium craftsmanship.
When it comes to design, Apple sticks to its signature minimalist square look with ultra-thin bezels and an incredibly lightweight body — as low as 38.8 grams. It’s elegant, futuristic, and feels like a true piece of wearable tech. Samsung, however, goes for a more traditional rounded aesthetic with its “squircle” shape and rotating bezel (especially on the Classic model), appealing to users who prefer a real-watch feel. Bandletic calls it a stylish clash between modern minimalism and timeless craftsmanship.
Display technology is another area where both excel. Apple’s OLED panel ranges from 1.78" to 1.97", offering adaptive refresh rates down to 1Hz for excellent power efficiency. Samsung’s Super AMOLED, on the other hand, hits up to a blazing 3000 nits of brightness and is shielded by sapphire glass. The verdict? Apple wins in visual sharpness and smoothness, but Samsung shines—literally—when it comes to brightness and durability.
Health and wellness tracking see major leaps on both sides. Apple integrates FDA-approved sleep apnea detection, advanced female health tools, and a new Vitals app that centralizes key body metrics. Samsung counters with an AI energy score, antioxidant index, and early-stage glucose monitoring — features that reflect its growing focus on proactive health insights rather than just passive tracking. Both deliver next-level precision, but Apple leans slightly more toward medical-grade reliability.
Performance-wise, the Galaxy Watch 8 boasts Samsung’s new 3nm Exynos W1000 chip with 2GB of RAM and 64GB of storage — offering snappier app response and faster multitasking. The Apple Watch Series 10 responds with its new S10 SiP chip and a neural engine for AI-enhanced Siri responses and smarter call handling. It’s a close race — Samsung leads in raw speed, while Apple dominates in seamless AI-driven optimization.
Battery life and charging are classic trade-offs. Samsung stretches endurance up to 40 hours, while Apple holds around 30 hours with much faster charging (80% in just 30 minutes). Samsung wins on stamina; Apple wins on convenience.
Ultimately, Bandletic’s verdict is clear:
The Galaxy Watch 8 is ideal for Android users who crave AI smarts, strong battery life, and traditional aesthetics. The Apple Watch Series 10, meanwhile, remains the gold standard for iPhone users — delivering a polished design, faster charging, and unmatched integration with iOS.
It’s a rivalry defined not by who’s better, but by who you are and what ecosystem you live in.